Titles

Notes

SPEC

• desing in line with project aims

• counter point to chapter 2

• justify idea and explain its basis

• detail functionallity

• suitable diagrams

POWER POINT TITLE

• what the solution will do

• why is it a good idea

• Connect aims and objectives with research from chapter two

• what i expect to deliver
  • ui diagrams
  • how the user will interact with it

• Include design ideas even if they are out of scope

POWER POINT DETAIL

chapter 2 should have set out an area of research to focus on

does chapter 3 specify which area of research or is that chapter two?

Note: the project aim is to “Can an e-learning mobile application with focus around short-form & gamified educational content improve student engagement?”

Research

• How it will achieve project aims

• Investigation requirements
  • Metics or critira that will be used to gague a high quality application
  • What are the research requirements?
  • How the requirements relate to chapter 2

• Planning process (methadology)
  • Alternate solutions
  • why choose this methadology?

Requirements

(app design is based around the investigation criteria and metrics)

• How it will achevie project aims

• Ideas
  • counter points to chapter 2
  • what will the solution do
  • why is it a good idea
    • connect with chapter 2

• MOSCOW requirements for appliation
  • what is expected to be delivered

• Diagrams
  • UI diagram
  • user flow diagram

3.3 Project Requirements and Design for Maximum Engagement and Learning Efficacy

3.3.1 Design Principles for Enhanced Student Engagement

• Chapter 2 Counterpoints and Compliments
  • Revisit the findings from Chapter 2 to inform the design of your e-learning platform, particularly focusing on overcoming the limitations of existing solutions.
  • Incorporate principles that are evidenced-based, drawing from both the literature review and anticipated findings from the empirical investigation.

• The Proposed Solution’s Novel Qualities
  • Highlight the innovative aspects of your e-learning platform that are designed to enhance engagement and learning.
  • Each feature's inclusion should be backed by empirical evidence or theoretical models that suggest its effectiveness.

3.3.2 Feature Prioritisation with MoSCoW Analysis

• Use the MoSCoW method to prioritize features based on their expected impact on engagement and academic performance, ensuring that the most critical elements are implemented first.

3.3.3 User Interface and Experience Illustration and Rational

• User Flow and User Engagement Impact
  • Detail the user experience design, emphasizing intuitive navigation and engagement mechanisms that are hypothesized to improve learning outcomes.
  • Explain the design choices using both theoretical frameworks and the anticipated results of the empirical study.

• Mock User Interface Illustrations
  • Present mock-ups that visually communicate the user interface design and flow.
  • Discuss how each design element is expected to contribute to engagement and learning, supported by references to the literature and the methodology chosen for empirical investigation.